 |
| Cardinal Jean-Louis Tauran, president of the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue |
Vatican Radio, Nov. 25, 2014 - The
head of the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue, Cardinal
Jean-Louis Tauran, told Muslim leaders in Iran on Tuesday that all
minority groups should be allowed to speak openly without fear of “any
negative reactions”. He said Muslims and Christians should be credible
partners in dialogue, while religious text books must “present religions
and their followers in an objective and respectful manner.”
The cardinal’s words came during the 9th Colloquium between Iran’s
Center for Interreligious Dialogue (CID) of the Islamic Culture and
Relations Organization (ICRO) and The Pontifical Council for
Interreligious Dialogue (PCID) which is taking place in Teheran on
November 25th and 26th. The theme of the meeting is “Christians and
Muslims in Constructive Dialogue for the Good of Society.”
Please find below the full text of Cardinal Tauran’s address:
Your Excellency Dr Abuzar Ibrahimi Turkaman,
Your Excellencies,
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Dear Friends,
First and foremost, I raise my heart in thanksgiving to God, the
Almighty and All-loving, in Whom we, Christians and Muslims, believe
with similarities and differences that make our respective religious
traditions inseparable parts of the great family of the Abrahamic
monotheism.
In my name and also in that of my delegation, I wish to thank Dr Ali
Muhammad Helmi, the Director General of the Center for Interreligious
Dialogue, and his staff for all what they have done to make this
important meeting possible.
From the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue, its
Secretary, Fr. Miguel Ayuso, was here in Iran for a preparatory meeting
of the Colloquium, while Mons. Khaled Akasheh, the Bureau Chief for
Islam, has been coordinating the event.
The contribution of speakers, participants, the Apostolic Nunciature
in Iran, and of the Chaldean, Armenian and Latin Churches, has been of
great importance for the preparation and the carrying out of this event.
This is our ninth colloquium. However, some of us had occasions to
meet during similar initiatives in other countries. These meetings, we
can say, have generated confidence, mutual esteem and collaboration. It
is hoped that the III Christian – Muslim Summit that will take place in
Rome next December, to which some of the participants of this
Colloquium, will only enhance these aspects necessary for
peace-building.
As we are all aware of, mutual knowledge and cooperation, especially
in times of crisis is of great importance. The very fact that religious
leaders and scholars from different religions traditions are meeting
together is an eloquent message to respective religions.
However, once we are back to our respective communities, the
questions normally put to us are: What are the advantage of your
dialogue for us, Muslims and Christians, at the grass root level? What
kind of changes can we expect in our daily life? These questions become
more pertinent for religious communities particularly for those that are
small in number in a society that has a strong majority belonging to
another religion. This is true in the case of Muslims in Italy, of
Christians in Iran, and both for Muslims and Christians in India.
An easy ‘temptation’ in this context can be that of speaking for
those communities saying, well, they are fine; they enjoy many
privileges, therefore, they should not complain of anything. It would,
however, be more opportune to give these little communities the
possibility of speaking about their situation openly, without fearing
any negative reactions either from the political authorities or from
their neighbours. Self-criticism and constructive criticism by others
are very useful. Through them either we open our eyes to the reality or
are helped to open to the same.
This leads me to an important aspect of being believers and also of
being believers in dialogue. It is the question of credibility. Am I
credible as a Christian or as a Muslim? And to be credible, I have to
ask myself whether I am consistent. Are my deeds in compliance with my
words or are they contradictory to one another? This is obviously true
also for our dialogue: Is it credible? Is it useful?
We are all aware of the necessity of dialogue of specialists, as
ours. We should also be aware of our responsibility of bringing the
finding and fruits of our meetings and deliberation to all spaces where
Muslims, Christians and other believers, and also persons of good will
who do not profess any religion live, work, study together. Education,
especially through text books, has the moral obligation to present
religions and their followers in an objective and respectful manner.
Also, religious discourses, in all their spaces and forms, have the
obligation of speaking about others as brothers and sisters. The words
of Imam Ali "Know that people are of two types: they are either your
brothers in religion or your equals in creation." (Nahjul Balagha,
Sermon #53), are of great significance. We can add a third category:
brotherhood in Abrahamic monotheism, that includes the Jews as well.
This reminds us of what Saint John Paul II said to the Christians of
Istanbul in respect to Muslims: let us remember the spiritual bonds that
unite us. Promoting these kinds of relations is one of the major
reasons for the existence of the Commission for Religious Relations with
Muslims at the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue.
Obviously, while remaining brothers and sisters in humanity and in the
Abrahamic monotheism, we constitute two distinct religions, that are
called to thank God for what we have in common, while knowing and
respecting our differences.
“Christians and Muslims in Constructive Dialogue for the Good of
Society” is the theme of our Colloquium. “Construction” normally refers
to the building of a house on strong foundations, layer by layer. We are
continuing to construct on what many other Muslims and Christians have
already done or are doing so. We need to be sure that we are doing good
work, on solid foundations, to be sure of the hoped results for our
present and our future.
While speaking of the good of the society, we refer to all its
components, without excluding any one. In this, we imitate God Who,
according to Jesus’ words, shines his sun on the good and on the evil,
and sends his rain on the good and on the evil alike. Let us therefore
prove by our deeds the usefulness of our deliberations and discussions.
The sub-themes that have been agreed upon and that will be presented
during our meeting are interesting and important at the same time:
Spirituality, religious values as a response to extremism and violence
and the role of media in promoting a culture of dialogue.
When these sub-themes were agreed upon during the preparatory
meeting, no one thought that the one regarding extremism and violence
would become so dramatically phenomenal. We cannot remain silent or
indifferent to the extreme, inhuman and multi-form violence of which
Christians and Yezidis have been subjected. Many of them, as we know,
have preferred death to renouncing their faith. They are true martyrs.
The sacrifice of those who were driven out of their homes, often
carrying but only the dress they were wearing, should not be forgotten.
Nothing can justify these heinous acts. Invoking religion to justify
these crimes would be a crime against religion itself as well.
Dear brothers and sisters, Muslims and Christians, and, in fact, all of humanity, need abundant
and concrete fruits of our dialogue. This meeting is like a star in a
dark night. Let us pray and work, in particular through our dialogue,
for a world of justice, peace, security, fraternity and prosperity.
Source:
http://en.radiovaticana.va/news/2014/11/25/card_tauran_muslims,_christians_must_be_credible_believers/1112325
